SFI Cambridge | Assessment Infographic — White Edition

Written Theoretical &
Practical Assessment

SFI Cambridge City
Assessment Types

unified · dynamic · future-ready

Non-Written Oral &
Practical Assessment

Hybrid Assessment
Integral of IB & Cambridge

Criteria for Non-Written Oral & Practical Assessment

A new contemporarly approach to students assessment
1. Authentic Oral Proficiency & Real-time Communication: Learners demonstrate fluency, active listening, and spontaneous dialogue in real-world scenarios. Practical rubrics include pronunciation, interactive turn-taking, and contextual persuasion tasks — mirroring professional environments beyond traditional testing.
2. Performance-Based Practical Mastery & Reflective Adaptation: Hands-on tasks, portfolio evidence, and simulated problem-solving replace memorization. Criteria emphasize creative thinking, collaborative projects, and iterative feedback loops. This shift aligns with contemporary pedagogical research, fostering resilience and 21st-century competencies while maintaining Cambridge academic integrity.
holistic · competence-driven · equitable
⚡ interconnected assessment ecosystem | SFI Cambridge City framework
SFI Cambridge City School – Oral & Practical Assessment Criteria
🎓 SFI CAMBRIDGE CITY SCHOOL UGANDA 🎓
📢 Oral Presentation and Practical Assessment Criteria 📢
✨ Implementation Framework | Non-digital (Cost effective resources) | Physical presentations only ✨
🧸

Kindergarten (Ages 4–6) – Show & Tell with Real Objects or Drawings

Duration: 1–3 min | Format: Individual or pair | Physical aids: 1 real object, hand-made drawing, class poster

CriterionEmerging (1)Developing (2)Proficient (3)
Speaks clearlyMumbles, needs promptingSpeaks with some clarityClear voice, whole class hears
Shows object/drawingHolds without referencePoints to 1–2 featuresExplains why object/drawing relates to topic
Eye contactLooks down or awayLooks up occasionallyLooks at audience several times
Stays on topicOff-topic >50%Partially on topicStays on topic throughout
✅ Focus: confidence, vocabulary, simple explanation
📚

Primary (Grade 1–6) – Poster or Model-Based Presentation

Duration: 3–5 min | Format: Individual or group (2–3) | Aids: Handmade poster, diorama (use of pictures), model (e.g design model of human heart, skeleton etc), props (movable objects)

CriterionWeightProficient Description
Introduction10%States name, topic, hook question/fact
Content knowledge25%Shares 3–4 accurate facts/examples related to lesson
Use of physical aid15%Points to and explains parts of poster/model; aid is relevant
Speaking skills20%Speaks slowly, loud enough, occasional pauses
Body language10%Faces audience, uses hand gestures, doesn’t hide behind poster
Conclusion10%Summarizes one main takeaway
Handling 1 question10%Listens and responds simply but appropriately
🎓

High School (Grade 7–9) – Structured Oral Presentation + Physical Support

Duration: 5–8 min + 2 min Q&A | Format: Individual or group (3–4) each member speaks | Aids: handmade charts, cardboard models, flip charts, chalkboard/whiteboard

CriterionWeightTop Band Descriptor (Cambridge 7–9)
Thesis/central claim15%Clear, debatable, connected to curriculum outcomes
Evidence & examples20%Cites 3+ sources from books/articles (orally); specific examples
Structure15%Logical: hook → background → argument → counter-argument → conclusion
Delivery & engagement15%Confident, varied tone, no reading from notes, reads audience
Use of physical aid10%Neat, visible, explained clearly, adds value
Q&A responsiveness15%Answers precisely, acknowledges limits, connects to broader ideas
Time management10%Within ±30 seconds, no rushing
👥

Group Presentation Add-On (All Levels)

+10% shared score

Equal participation: Each member speaks roughly equal time, smooth handovers.

+5% collaboration

Collaboration visible: Members support each other (nodding, adding points naturally, no interrupting).


Assessment model: 70% group shared grade + 30% individual (based on peer assessment + teacher observation). Each group completes a Role Contract (Leader, Materials Manager, Presenters).

📅

Termly Implementation Plan

🗓️ Weekly Timeline

  • Week 1: Teacher demo + rubric walkthrough
  • Week 2: Topic selection & group formation
  • Week 3: Workshop: “Making effective posters & models without tech”
  • Week 4: Proposal submission (topic + physical aid sketch)
  • Week 5: Practice round with peer feedback
  • Week 6-7: Mid-term presentations (spread over 3–4 days)
  • Week 8: Feedback & best presentation showcase

📊 Mid-Term Assessment Weighting

  • Live physical presentation (individual/group): 40%
  • Physical aid (poster/model/chart): 10%
  • Oral Q&A response: 10%
  • Written reflection/short answers (same topic): 40%

🛠️ Low-Cost Physical Resources

Chart paper, markers, recycled cardboard, clay, class whiteboard, flip chart. No electricity or devices required.

🧪

Subject-Based Physical Aids | Cost-effective Non-Digital Aids | Students can use any aid of their choice relevant to their presentation(s)

Physics Chemistry Global Perspectives Business Studies Digital Literacy Biology ICT English Literature Languages (French/Kiswahili) Sociology History Geography Mathematics
🔭 Physics: handmade pulley model, lever from cardboard, simple circuit diagram on chart
⚗️ Chemistry: 3D molecular model using clay/toothpicks, pH scale poster with everyday liquids
🌍 Global Perspectives: poster showing climate change impacts, community map with sustainable solutions
📊 Business Studies: flip chart of supply-demand graph, product packaging prototype (recycled)
💻 Digital Literacy: printed hardware chart, keyboard layout poster, flowcharts of internet safety (non-digital visual)
🧬 Biology: 3D clay cell model, cardboard digestive system, paper flower parts diagram
📡 ICT: hand-drawn network topology, input/output device poster, binary conversion wheel (cardboard)
📖 English: grammar rules poster (tenses, punctuation), story elements chart, character trait flipbook
📚 Literature: theme poster (conflict, symbolism), book timeline scroll, character analysis wheel, poetry analysis board
🗣️ Languages (French/Kiswahili): bilingual vocabulary picture cards, everyday phrases flip chart, cultural poster (greetings, common objects)
🏛️ Sociology: family tree poster, community roles flipchart, cultural norms comparison board

📢 N.B Some of the above subjects like History & Geography are included just for reference purposes, they are not yet part of our school curriculum. Students can use any aid/support materials relevant/appropriate to the topic, and their individual or group presentations.

Student Self-Assessment (after presentation): “My physical aid helped audience understand: Yes/Somewhat/No” + “Next time I will improve…”

✨📋

Evaluation Forms & Assessment Checklists-Kindergarten, Primary & High School

Magical rubrics with interactive style — teachers shall use these checklists for quick & comprehensive oral/practical assessment across levels.

🧸 Kindergarten Evaluation Form (Show & Tell / Physical Aid)
Speaks 1-2 clear sentences
Holds object/poster and points
Attempts eye contact with audience
Stays on theme for at least 1 minute
Uses simple describing words (big, red, soft)
Responds to teacher’s gentle question (nod/word)
Shows excitement/confidence (body language)
⭐ Rating: 1-Emerging | 2-Developing | 3-Proficient | 4-Exemplary ⭐
🎯 Teacher note: Circle descriptors, total raw score X/28 → convert to progress comment.
📖 Primary Assessment Checklist (Grades 1-6)
Introduction (name + topic + why it matters)
Uses physical aid (poster/model) to explain 2+ key points
Content facts: at least 3 correct details from subject
Speaks with appropriate volume and pace
Posture: faces audience, uses gestures naturally
Conclusion: summarizes one main idea clearly
Answers 1 question politely with simple reasoning
Teamwork (if group): each child contributes equally
Physical aid is neat and visible from back of class
⭐ Performance Levels: 1-2 Below Expectation | 3-4 Approaching | 5-6 Proficient | 7-9 Outstanding ⭐
✅ Checklist can be used as a quick observation tool – mark ✔/✘ for each indicator, then final grade.
🎓 High School Assessment Checklist (Cambridge-ready)
Clear thesis/argument presented (hook & stance)
At least 3 pieces of evidence (facts, examples, references)
Logical structure: intro → body → counterpoint → conclusion
Mastery of physical aid (explains data/model/chart efficiently)
Engaging delivery: vocal variety, minimal notes, eye contact
Handles Q&A confidently (respectful & relevant answers)
Time management (within ±30 seconds, smooth pacing)
Collaboration (group setting): smooth transitions, all members participate substantially
Use of non-digital support material enhances understanding (no tech gimmicks)
Reflection: acknowledges limitations or next improvement step
🔥 Holistic Scale: 1-3 Developing | 4-6 Proficient | 7-8 Advanced | 9-10 Exceptional (Cambridge benchmark) 🔥
📌 Teachers: Use this checklist plus analytical grade from weight table on top. Provide written comments on “Strength” and “Next Steps”.

🎨 We highly recommend our staff to use these forms-Robert Ssekolya (Principal): Print or use digital annotation (if you opt to use your PC/smartphone). Each checklist provides clear criteria for fair, transparent, and engaging oral/practical assessment. These align with SFI Cambridge’s curriculum implementation & contempolary assessment strategy.

⚙️

Challenges & Solutions (Physical Presentations)

😟 Time grading
Use single-point rubric; grade 2–3 criteria per round.
😟 Student anxiety
Allow pair presentations for Kindergarten–Primary; recorded only if extreme need (teacher discretion).
😟 Subject mismatch (Math)
Present real-world problem-solving steps on a flip chart.
😟 Inconsistent standards
Monthly teacher moderation with video-less live demos.
😟 Parent resistance
Show Cambridge alignment: oral components (Oral assessment is integral of Cambridge assessment) & IB skills (Similar mode of assessment for IB curriculum).
Success Metrics (End of term): 80% on-time completion, 70% proficient in speaking & physical aid use, positive feedback from parents.