Written Theoretical &
Practical Assessment
SFI Cambridge City
Assessment Types
Non-Written Oral &
Practical Assessment
Hybrid Assessment
Integral of IB & Cambridge
Criteria for Non-Written Oral & Practical Assessment
Kindergarten (Ages 4–6) – Show & Tell with Real Objects or Drawings
Duration: 1–3 min | Format: Individual or pair | Physical aids: 1 real object, hand-made drawing, class poster
| Criterion | Emerging (1) | Developing (2) | Proficient (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speaks clearly | Mumbles, needs prompting | Speaks with some clarity | Clear voice, whole class hears |
| Shows object/drawing | Holds without reference | Points to 1–2 features | Explains why object/drawing relates to topic |
| Eye contact | Looks down or away | Looks up occasionally | Looks at audience several times |
| Stays on topic | Off-topic >50% | Partially on topic | Stays on topic throughout |
Primary (Grade 1–6) – Poster or Model-Based Presentation
Duration: 3–5 min | Format: Individual or group (2–3) | Aids: Handmade poster, diorama (use of pictures), model (e.g design model of human heart, skeleton etc), props (movable objects)
| Criterion | Weight | Proficient Description |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | 10% | States name, topic, hook question/fact |
| Content knowledge | 25% | Shares 3–4 accurate facts/examples related to lesson |
| Use of physical aid | 15% | Points to and explains parts of poster/model; aid is relevant |
| Speaking skills | 20% | Speaks slowly, loud enough, occasional pauses |
| Body language | 10% | Faces audience, uses hand gestures, doesn’t hide behind poster |
| Conclusion | 10% | Summarizes one main takeaway |
| Handling 1 question | 10% | Listens and responds simply but appropriately |
High School (Grade 7–9) – Structured Oral Presentation + Physical Support
Duration: 5–8 min + 2 min Q&A | Format: Individual or group (3–4) each member speaks | Aids: handmade charts, cardboard models, flip charts, chalkboard/whiteboard
| Criterion | Weight | Top Band Descriptor (Cambridge 7–9) |
|---|---|---|
| Thesis/central claim | 15% | Clear, debatable, connected to curriculum outcomes |
| Evidence & examples | 20% | Cites 3+ sources from books/articles (orally); specific examples |
| Structure | 15% | Logical: hook → background → argument → counter-argument → conclusion |
| Delivery & engagement | 15% | Confident, varied tone, no reading from notes, reads audience |
| Use of physical aid | 10% | Neat, visible, explained clearly, adds value |
| Q&A responsiveness | 15% | Answers precisely, acknowledges limits, connects to broader ideas |
| Time management | 10% | Within ±30 seconds, no rushing |
Group Presentation Add-On (All Levels)
Equal participation: Each member speaks roughly equal time, smooth handovers.
Collaboration visible: Members support each other (nodding, adding points naturally, no interrupting).
Assessment model: 70% group shared grade + 30% individual (based on peer assessment + teacher observation). Each group completes a Role Contract (Leader, Materials Manager, Presenters).
Termly Implementation Plan
🗓️ Weekly Timeline
- Week 1: Teacher demo + rubric walkthrough
- Week 2: Topic selection & group formation
- Week 3: Workshop: “Making effective posters & models without tech”
- Week 4: Proposal submission (topic + physical aid sketch)
- Week 5: Practice round with peer feedback
- Week 6-7: Mid-term presentations (spread over 3–4 days)
- Week 8: Feedback & best presentation showcase
📊 Mid-Term Assessment Weighting
- Live physical presentation (individual/group): 40%
- Physical aid (poster/model/chart): 10%
- Oral Q&A response: 10%
- Written reflection/short answers (same topic): 40%
🛠️ Low-Cost Physical Resources
Chart paper, markers, recycled cardboard, clay, class whiteboard, flip chart. No electricity or devices required.
Subject-Based Physical Aids | Cost-effective Non-Digital Aids | Students can use any aid of their choice relevant to their presentation(s)
Student Self-Assessment (after presentation): “My physical aid helped audience understand: Yes/Somewhat/No” + “Next time I will improve…”
Evaluation Forms & Assessment Checklists-Kindergarten, Primary & High School
✨Magical rubrics with interactive style — teachers shall use these checklists for quick & comprehensive oral/practical assessment across levels.
🎨 We highly recommend our staff to use these forms-Robert Ssekolya (Principal): Print or use digital annotation (if you opt to use your PC/smartphone). Each checklist provides clear criteria for fair, transparent, and engaging oral/practical assessment. These align with SFI Cambridge’s curriculum implementation & contempolary assessment strategy.
Challenges & Solutions (Physical Presentations)
Use single-point rubric; grade 2–3 criteria per round.
Allow pair presentations for Kindergarten–Primary; recorded only if extreme need (teacher discretion).
Present real-world problem-solving steps on a flip chart.
Monthly teacher moderation with video-less live demos.
Show Cambridge alignment: oral components (Oral assessment is integral of Cambridge assessment) & IB skills (Similar mode of assessment for IB curriculum).
